National Loan Auditors

Forensic Loan Audit Pro™US Court Audit™SafeGuard Audit™Expert WitnessNLA Law PortalContact NLA

The California State Senate has passed Senate Bill 94 (”SB 94?), legislation proposed by Sen. Ron S. Calderon (D-Montebello), Chairman of the Banking, Finance & Insurance Committee. The senate passed the bill on May 21, 2009, by a vote of 21 to 14. It is now in the state assembly where it has been read once and “held at desk,” which means that it’s awaiting referral to a committee.

Senate Bill 94 is intended to protect California homeowners from scam loan modification companies.

In my view, the problems with SB 94, as written include:

1. It was created to protect consumers from loan modification “scammers” who charge distressed homeowners up front fees and deliver nothing in return, but it was written without the benefit of accurate data on the contribution being made by the legitimate loan modification industry in California. Without knowing how many homeowners the private sector loan modification firms save each month, or the sustainability of the modifications obtained by the private sector, it would not be possible to design a solution in the best interests of homeowners and the state’s economy.

2. The SB 94 bill, as written, is based on a fundamental misconception. As stated in the in bill’s narrative:

“It is not necessary to pay a third party to arrange for a loan modification or other form of forbearance from your mortgage lender or servicer. You may call your lender directly to ask for a change in your loan terms. Nonprofit housing counseling agencies also offer these and other forms of borrower assistance free of charge.”

While both of these statements are technically true, this language ignores the fact that there are also reputable private sector firms that homeowners may choose to hire to help them negotiate with their banks when seeking a modification of their mortgages. Private sector firms, including those licensed by the state’s Department of Real Estate and/or law firms offering that such services, have helped tens of thousands of California homeowners get their mortgages modified. With the number of foreclosures continuing to increase each month, it would seem clear that the state’s homeowners would not benefit from any legitimate avenue being overlooked or unfairly maligned.

3. Defrauding a homeowner has always been against California law, so in that sense, SB 94 is redundant. When you consider that “scammers” who did in fact defraud consumers in conjunction with the promise of a loan modification, did so in violation of existing law, it would seem that a new law making it illegal to charge an advance fee when offering to assist a homeowner with a loan modification would be unlikely to prevent future scammers from attempting to do the same.

4. Legitimate firms offering to assist troubled homeowners could be regulated and monitored, without requiring these firms to operate at a financial disadvantage by disallowing advance fees. The process of obtaining a loan modification is not similar to other real estate transactions in several key ways:

A. The process can take six weeks, or six months… and in some cases even longer. The lenders and servicers are not consistent in how loan modifications are handled or on what basis they are granted.

B. There is no escrow, or objective standard for “satisfaction,” in conjunction with a loan modification transaction, and therefore there is no assurance that a company would receive payment from the homeowner once the mortgage has been modified.

These are just a few of the issues with SB 94. The law is attempting to protect homeowners, but is actually protecting the lender guaranteeing that homeowners will not be adequately represented when dealing with the lender. The lenders will take advantage of this and will offer homeowners loan modifications that do not help their situation.

Get free updates! Subscribe to this blog for the latest news and features from National Loan Auditors!

Source: National Loan Auditors, Inc.
http://www.NLAudit.com



Subscribe

Stephen Hoshida, Manager of National Loan Auditors’ Online Legal Portal, continues his discussion of the loan modification process in Part II of this interview series:

  1. What factors are taken into consideration by the mortgage lender when determining whether or not a borrower qualifies for a loan?
    • There are a number of factors that the lender takes into account when considering a loan modification. The primary concern for lenders may be the financial status of the homeowners. The lender needs to know what the financial situation of the homeowners is to know how they need to modify the loan. The lender will consider the violations that are found in the homeowner’s forensic loan audit. There are also external considerations on the lender such as federal programs, economic climate, and the will of the investors. All of these will be incorporated into the lenders decision on how to modify a loan.

  1. What challenges can homeowners expect to face during the loan modification process?
    • The hardest part of a loan modification is the waiting period. The process may take some time and loan modification departments of the lenders are being over worked. If the homeowner is already experiencing financial hardship, the time it takes to negotiate a loan modification will compound the problem. Another challenge a homeowner may experience is in dealing with the lender. Lending companies have many different departments, each with a different agenda, and often time these departments are not informed as to what the other branches are doing. Also, with the unstable financial climate, banks are absorbing other banks and restructuring their own departments which results in a continual change in internal procedure.

  1. How would a loan audit from National Loan Auditors benefit an attorney or other mortgage industry professional?
    • Forensic loan audits from NLA can specifically benefit attorneys and other mortgage professionals by giving them a quick legally sound distilment of a borrower’s case that they can use to plan their strategy on how to litigate the case or to approach a loan modification.
  1. What sets National Loan Auditors apart from other forensic loan audit providers?
    • National Loan Auditors provides the best forensic loan audit on the market. NLA’s forensic loan audit contains over 125 checks to insure that the lender adhered to all the statutory regulations when issuing a loan. The Forensic Loan Audit Pro is the only “legal-centric” audit. This means that the audit not only outlines the lender violations that occurred in the loan, but also provides supporting statute an case law to explain why a violation occurred and how the violation can be used in a court of law.
  1. How long does it take to complete a forensic loan audit?
    • A forensic loan audit only takes about 1 day to actually complete the audit. However with the demand for audits right now it takes about 5 days for a borrower to receive their audit.
  1. With new legislation designed to support and protect homeowners, how will government efforts, like the Make Homes Affordable program, affect the loan modification process?
    • The MHA Program has been a huge step in the right direction to address the needs of the homeowners. MHA streamlines the process for homeowners to workout a loan modification. That being said they are still not a cure all. MHA only address a fraction of the problem loans out there because it only applies to Frannie and Freddie loan. There are still millions of homeowners out there who will not qualify through this plan. Lenders are doing what they can to come up with their own loan modification plans that address the remaining loan but they are swamped and understaffed so this process is slow.
  1. Are National Loan Auditors’ forensic loan audits available only in California?
    • No, NLA provides forensic loan audits nationwide. We are even developing international audits for other countries.
  1. What changes occur within the mortgage after a loan modification?
    • The changes to the mortgage are a modification of the terms of the agreement, hence the name loan modification. The original loan is still in effect and all the associated terms still stand, but the specific terms negotiated in the modification process are changed to reflect the new agreement. At it’s core a loan modification is a simple contract change.
  1. Who should homeowners contact to receive help and more information?
    • National Loan Auditors
    • 877-NLA-6676
    • 1820 Bonanza St. Suite 201
    • Walnut Creek, CA 94596
    • www.NLAudit.com
    • ——————–
    • eModify Inc. a Legal Advocacy Group
    • 877-4-EMODIFY
    • 1820 Bonanza St. Suite 201
    • Walnut Creek, CA 94596
    • www.eModify.net

About National Loan Auditors:

National Loan Auditors is the Nation’s leading and most reputable provider of comprehensive forensic loan audit reports, offering superior services with unsurpassed results. Founded by August Blass, a financial services veteran with more than 20 years of executive experience in the field, the Walnut Creek, CA-based company provides quality control pre-close and post-close auditing, risk assessment consulting and fraud prevention services to the mortgage and banking industries.

Stephen Hoshida is a graduate of California State University Chico, with a Bachelor of Arts in Political Science and has completed his Jurist Doctorate at Golden Gate University of San Francisco. While attending law school, Stephen focused primarily on criminal law, working in the San Francisco County and Butte County District Attorney’s Offices.

Source: National Loan Auditors, Inc.
http://www.NLAudit.com

Subscribe

Subscribe

Copyright © 2009 National Loan Auditors, Inc. All rights reserved.